In February 2025, the U.S. government imposed emergency tariffs on a broad range of imported goods under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA). In February 2026, the US Supreme Court struck down all IEEPA tariffs as unconstitutional, subsequently CBP was directed to refund duties paid at the higher IEEPA rates.
This isn’t a discretionary benefit or an application process where eligibility is uncertain. Companies that imported covered goods during the eligible window are owed money back with interest. The question is whether claims are filed on time and filed correctly.
Are You the Importer of Record — or a Downstream Buyer?
The recovery path depends on how goods entered your supply chain. The two situations are meaningfully different — and confusing them is the most common reason companies either miss a refund they're entitled to or pursue the wrong process.
If you filed directly with CBP
Your company is the importer of record. You can file via CAPE. Use the calculator on this page to estimate your refund, then connect with a specialist to file before your entry-level protest windows close.
If you bought from a U.S. distributor
Your company is a downstream buyer. The CAPE portal is only accessible to the company named on the customs entry — and that's not you. But the money may still be recoverable.
Between February 2025 and February 2026, importers absorbed IEEPA tariff costs on roughly $127 billion worth of goods and, in many cases, passed those costs through their supply chain. If your invoices showed line items labelled "tariff surcharge," "IEEPA fee," or "duty pass-through" — or if unit prices increased substantially during that window — your company likely absorbed some of that burden.
Now that CBP is processing refunds, your supplier stands to collect. The question is whether any of that recovery flows back to you.
The legal path for downstream buyers
There is no administrative portal for downstream buyers. Recovery works through a different mechanism: a documented demand to the supplier, supported by forensic analysis of purchase history, SKU-level cost mapping, and evidence of pass-through. The legal theories that support a claim include unjust enrichment, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and in some cases explicit contractual provisions.
This is complex work requiring trade attorneys, CPAs, and customs specialists working the same file. It is typically handled on contingency.
Signs of a viable downstream claim
A company is likely a good candidate if:
- Goods were purchased from U.S.-based distributors at scale
- Those goods were sourced overseas — China, Vietnam, Southeast Asia, the EU
- Invoices, memos, or supplier communications reference tariff-related cost increases during the February 2025–February 2026 window
- Tariff surcharges were a meaningful budget line — not a rounding error